Skip to content
Our position on climate change

We accept the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) assessment of climate change science, which has found that warming of the climate is unequivocal, the human influence is clear and physical impacts are unavoidable.

We believe the world must pursue the twin objectives of limiting climate change to the lower end of the IPCC emission scenarios in line with current international agreements, while providing access to reliable and affordable energy to support economic development and improved living standards. We do not prioritise one of these objectives over the other – both are essential to sustainable development.

Under all current plausible scenarios, fossil fuels will continue to be a significant part of the energy mix for decades. Therefore, an acceleration of effort to drive energy efficiency, develop and deploy low-emissions technology and adapt to the impacts of climate change is needed. We believe there should be a price on carbon, implemented in a way that addresses competitiveness concerns and achieves lowest cost emissions reductions.

In September 2015, we released our Climate Change: Portfolio Analysis, to provide insight into our approach to scenario analysis and the potential impacts on our portfolio of a shift to a 2 degree world. 

In response to emerging climate policy, in September 2016 we issued an update - Climate Change: Portfolio Analysis – ‘Views after Paris’- which provides insight into how we track signals in the external environment, to provide an indication of which scenarios are becoming more or less dominant. 

Our approach

BHP’s strategy is tied to economic growth in both emerging and developed economies and sustainable development requires an effective response to climate change. As a result, responding to climate change is a priority Board governance and strategic issue for our Company. Management has primary responsibility for the design and implementation of an effective position on, and response to, climate change. Our strategy is underpinned by active engagement with our stakeholders, including investors, policy makers, peer companies and non-government organisations.

As a major producer and consumer of fossil fuels, we recognise our responsibility to take action by focusing on reducing our greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions; increasing our preparedness for climate impacts; and working with others, including academia, industry and governments, to enhance the global response to climate change.

In December 2015, we welcomed the agreement reached at the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) 21st Conference of the Parties (COP21) in Paris to hold the increase in the global average temperature to well below two degrees Celsius and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5 degrees Celsius. Together with a range of businesses and other non-state entities, we demonstrated our support by signing the UNFCCC Paris Pledge. 

Industry has a key role to play in climate change policy development by working with governments and other stakeholders to inform the development of an effective, long-term policy framework that delivers a measured transition to a lower emissions economy. 

We believe an effective policy framework should include a complementary set of measures, including a price on carbon, support for low-emissions technology and measures to build resilience. 

Industry associations are an important forum for discussion and debate of key industry issues, including climate change policy, and are most effective when they allow for discussion of a wide range of views. It is not the role of industry associations to represent BHP alone and there are times when our perspectives may not be aligned. However, our role is to share our position in a clear way that enables us to have a constructive influence within our industry.  

We regularly seek to share lessons learned and identify solutions that we believe can drive emissions reductions at the lowest cost. BHP has hosted several policy roundtables, including a meeting of the International Emissions Trading Association in 2016, bringing cross-sectoral business groups together to discuss different ways that business and government can address climate change. Together with a group of public, private and social leaders, we joined the Energy Transitions Commission, which ‘aims to identify pathways for change in our energy systems to ensure both better growth and a better climate’. BHP is a signatory to the World Bank’s “Putting a Price on Carbon” statement, and we are a member of the World Bank’s Carbon Pricing Leadership Coalition. 

With seven other major Australian companies representing around 12 per cent of the country’s GHG emissions, we signed the CEO Statement on Business, Climate Change and the Paris Negotiations calling for a positive outcome at COP21. We have an ongoing commitment to transparent and open communications. 

Our extensive engagement program with investors, government and the broader society includes our voluntary submission to CDP.

Our performance

Our integrated approach to addressing climate change has four areas of activity: mitigation, adaptation, low-emissions technology and portfolio evaluation. 

Mitigation

With our FY2017 emissions of 16.3 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2-e) at 21 per cent below the adjusted FY2006 baseline, we have successfully achieved our ambitious five-year target to keep our absolute GHG emissions below our FY2006 baseline while growing our business.

Numerous individual improvement projects have contributed to this achievement, as well as improvements in productivity and technology, and changes in production profile. Projects tracked since FY2013 as part of our FY2013–FY2017 GHG target achieved more than 975,000 tonnes CO2-e of annualised abatement in FY2017 at our Continuing operations.

Greenhouse Gas Emissions Graph

In addition to identifying opportunities within our Company, we also seek to contribute to global GHG emissions reductions. We are currently implementing a strategy to support REDD+ - Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation

Adaptation

Our assets are long-lived, therefore we must take a robust, risk-based approach to adapting to the physical impacts of climate change. Effective analysis of climate science is critical to informing our resilience planning. We continue to work with the CSIRO (Australia’s national science agency) to obtain regional analyses of climate change science. This informs climate change resilience planning at an asset level, improving our understanding of the material climate vulnerabilities that our operations face. 

There are many opportunities for us to take action now to build climate change resilience into our operations and future investments. It is a requirement for all our operations to do this as part of Our Requirements for Environment and Climate Change standard. We also require new investments to assess and manage risks associated with the forecast impacts of climate change. 

A leading example has been provided by our Western Australia Iron Ore (WAIO) operations. For the Pilbara region, climate conditions are expected to be hotter (both averages and extremes) and drier in coming decades, with higher sea levels along the coast. Tropical cyclones may decrease in number, but are likely to increase in intensity and duration over the same period. WAIO undertook an integrated and system-wide study to identify the climate vulnerabilities in the production system, assess the material climate risks and evaluate the effectiveness of existing controls in the face of the changing climate. Following the study, a Climate Resilience Plan for WAIO was developed. Action Plans will be implemented over the next five years to address the critical strategic priorities.

The most appropriate approach to building climate change resilience will vary depending on the life of the asset, its exposure to climatic factors and its function. In nearly all cases, collaborative approaches with a range of stakeholders will be necessary to ensure we have effective approaches to climate change resilience. We are also looking at ways we can contribute to community and ecosystem resilience outside of business resilience planning.

Find out more about some of the ways we are building capacity for climate change adaptation.

Low-emissions technology

Technology and innovation have the potential to significantly reduce global emissions and enable long-term climate goals to be met. Given that fossil fuels are likely to continue to be a significant part of the energy mix for decades, it is vital that low-emissions technology is available at scale, lower cost and much faster than the usual commercial timeframes to meet the challenge of climate change. We believe industry has a significant collaborative role to play with government, academia and the community to facilitate this necessary step-change.

We have established an integrated strategy that invests across a range of technologies to reduce material emissions in our operations and across our supply chains, including from the use of our products. When evaluating opportunity areas for potential investment, we look at several different factors, including the potential to materially reduce emissions, and the opportunity to use our own skills and expertise to accelerate the change required.

Our roadmap for investment includes developing and demonstrating carbon capture and storage, technologies to reduce fugitive methane emissions from coal and petroleum operations, battery storage and high-efficiency/low-emissions power generation and transportation. Read more on our low-emissions technology investments.

In April 2017, we established a research collaboration with the University of Melbourne, University of Cambridge and Stanford University to support fundamental research into the long-term storage mechanisms of CO2 in sub-surface locations. This important work has the possibility of unlocking significant storage potential, which will be an essential part of effective Carbon Capture and Storage. The research also seeks to demonstrate the safety and security of sub-surface CO2 storage.

Portfolio evaluation

We continue to identify and assess the impacts of climate change on our portfolio. Our corporate planning process uses scenario analysis to encompass a wide spectrum of potential outcomes for key global uncertainties. This planning starts with the construction of a central case, a forecast built through an in-depth, bottom-up analysis using rigorous processes and benchmarked with external views. This central case is thoroughly reviewed and endorsed periodically by the Executive Leadership Team and the Board.

Scenarios that describe the different ways the world could evolve beyond our central case allow us to explore potential portfolio discontinuities and opportunities. In our Climate Change: Portfolio Analysis report (released in September 2015), we outlined four different scenarios, each designed to be divergent, plausible and internally consistent. Our four scenarios assess the timing and implementation of various government policies, emission reduction targets and technology developments. In one of the scenarios, we see a more unified focus on limiting climate change, including an orderly transition to a two degree Celsius world. 

We also stress test our portfolio against a shock event that leads to a much more rapid transition to a two degree Celsius world by 2030. This is driven by higher government emission reduction targets and faster technology developments. We include a price on carbon in all scenarios. For our central case, this equates to US$24 per tonne, with a range between US$50 and US$80 per tonne for scenarios that deliver outcomes consistent with a two degree Celsius world.

The analysis highlights that our uniquely diversified portfolio of high-quality, low-cost assets is robust under both an orderly and a more rapid transition to a two degree Celsius world. We also have a strong project pipeline with many capital-efficient growth options that continue to generate high shareholder value in a two degree Celsius world.

While demand continues to grow for most commodities in our two degrees Celsius scenarios, there are winners and losers in our portfolio. Oil and coal are most impacted; however, fossil fuels are still likely to supply the majority of the world’s energy in 2040, even in a two degree Celsius world. Based on our analysis, copper, uranium, potash and gas are predicted to be robust and mitigate potential negative impacts on other commodities, as will higher-grade products in iron ore and metallurgical coal. The analysis shows that our portfolio is highly unlikely to result in assets being ‘stranded’.

Since the release of our original Climate Change: Portfolio Analysis report we have seen signs that might indicate a movement to a two degree Celsius world. In September 2016 we issued an update - Climate Change: Portfolio Analysis – ‘Views after Paris’ - which included analysis of emerging climate policy (e.g. COP21) and low-emissions technology developments. 

There will be many risks and opportunities as the world continues to respond to climate change and they will be faced by companies in all sectors, albeit to varying degrees. With the right market settings, including a price on carbon, the greatest opportunities will emerge for those who can produce the lowest cost and most efficient solutions, in line with the expectations of communities and policy makers.

Over BHP’s long history, we have continually demonstrated our ability to reposition ourselves for future growth by divesting those parts of our business that do not align with our strategy or by investing in new commodities where we see a strong long-term growth story.

Our way forward

As a leading global resources company, we have a broad role to play in supporting the transition towards a two degree Celsius world, including the development of low-emissions technology, a commitment to focus on reducing the emissions associated with our operations and to increasing our preparedness for physical climate impacts. We will continue to share our market experience to support governments in delivering the changes in policy and regulation required to successfully address climate change.

Building on the success of our previous target to limit our operational emissions in FY2017 to the FY2006 emissions baseline, in FY2018, we will commence working towards a new target of limiting FY2022 net operational GHG emissions at or below FY2017 levels while we continue to grow our business.

In addition to setting a five-year GHG target, we have set a longer-term emission reduction goal to achieve net-zero operational emissions in the latter half of this century.

Our five-year target and longer term emission reduction goal will require our teams to think differently. They will unlock innovation and drive collaboration across BHP’s functions and assets. We will prioritise the lowest-cost, most material abatement opportunities across our global portfolio.

In addition to identifying opportunities within our Company, in FY2016, we undertook a project to increase our understanding of the GHG emissions in our supply chain (our Scope 3 emissions). The results of this work will enable us to engage more meaningfully with our suppliers and customers, and assist in the identification of material opportunities to reduce emissions.

We are committed to keeping our stakeholders informed of the impact of climate change on BHP. Our Vice President of Climate Change and Sustainability is a member of the Financial Stability Board’s Taskforce on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD), which develops voluntary, consistent climate-related financial risk disclosures. We are strongly committed to continuing to work with the TCFD to retain our position as an industry leader in climate-related disclosures and transparency. Our climate change public disclosures are aligned with the newly issued recommendations of the TCFD.

As the global investment community seeks greater insight into the strategies being implemented by corporations and governments to manage climate change risk, the nature of effective disclosure will evolve. We believe that disclosure frameworks should focus on relevant, risk-based information that eliminates duplication, is easily understandable and is useful to decision-makers.

Loading the player...